The first reason that makes MLK's philosophy better than Malcolm X's is MLK's view onnonviolence. Unlike Malcolm X, who advised his supporters to use violence if confronted by a racist, MLK told his followers to never use violence no matter what the case was. ccordin! to MLK, "#iolence may murder the murderer, but it doesn't murder. #iolence may murder the liar, but it doesn't murder lie$ it doesn't establish truth. #iolence may even murder the dishonest man, but it doesn't murder dishonesty. #iolence may !o to the point of murderin! the hater, but it doesn't murder hate" %&ocument (. The phrase basically means that violence could !et rid of one man, but can't !et rid of an idea. )e is sayin! that violence will not solve any problems, but *ust stir more. Malcolm X on the other hand says, "+ believe we should protect ourselves by any means necessary when we are attacked by racist" % &ocument (. This philosophy would not improve the -ivil i!hts Movement, but *ust worsen it. +f frican mericans responded to the violence, the media would manipulate the scene and make it look like the frican mericans were the ones bein! a!!ressive and violent. +f MLK's philosophy was used, there was no way that the frican mericans could appear violent which would make the white man look like the "bad !uy". MLK's philosophy was e/tremely effective and was is one of the reasons we have -ivil i!hts today.The second reason that MLK's philosophy was better than Malcolm X's was that it helpedthe frican merican community's economy and helped it thrive to new peaks never seen before.MLK's way of usin! marches and boycotts were e/tremely successful in helpin! the economy. 0us se!re!ation was a bi! issue for frican mericans because it was their main way of transportation to their *obs so they could earn money. 0ut usin! nonviolent techni1ues like the Mont!omery 0oycott, bus se!re!ation was finally inte!rated and 2e!ros could finally ride the
Watching Freedom Fall Before Us
As people walk around in today time we see people of all races, we might judge them but in the United States of America we can’t deny, anyone of any race, anything. So in the 1960’s whose philosophy led to this unity in today's time and made the most sense? Was it Malcolm X or Martin Luther King? In that time of drastic change and opportunity, I think that Martin Luther King’s philosophy made the most sense for the 1960’s and still makes sense today. The Civil Rights Movement began almost instantaneously after World War II. When the Civil Rights Movement got moving and on its way was when the court case Brown vs. Board of Education was decided. This changed the future of America and gave so many activist and even ordinary people a chance to speak up. It provoked a revolution, and it wouldn’t stop until the wrongs were righted. MLK dove right in and expressed his hopes and visions to the whole of America. He believed that America good change for the better good. That all people were equal and integration was the best thing for this nation. Malcolm X also had a great vision but it was barbarian and wouldn’t suit the nearing future. Malcolm X rested assured that racial separation was the best for a fast-growing country. Both were indeed intelligent men who had different ideas of how to accomplish the same goal. Both were right in their own ways. But MLK took the stand and dove in and never stopped striving for freedom. Indeed MLK philosophy made the most sense in the 1960’s showing non-violence to people who had become accustomed to it, and expressing the greatness of human life.
Martin Luther King Jr. was born on January 15, 1929 no one could have guessed that this little infant was destined to success; to alter the course of American History. He was raised in a family that had love going around and told him as a young child to no resent whites even through all they have done. This was the biggest difference between MLK and...